So are we just going to ignore that Lara Logan claimed she had “multiple intelligence sources” tell her that the Baltimore port incident was a “9/11 style attack”?

She compared 6 civilian deaths, to 3,000 civilian deaths in the most significant terror attack in American history…

And since when did we start believing unnamed sources? When the MSM do that, we rightfully criticize them, because “unnamed sources” are used as a shield for journalists to make shit up, without consequence.

After intent being ruled out, she then claimed this was a “cyberattack” and the fallout will be an “economic nuke strike”. All authorities, local, State, Federal, Military, and private sector, have ALL confirmed their investigations do not indicate this was a terror attack, and they have reviewed the “black box” on the ship for all communications, determining that there is no evidence of intent or foul play at this time. The US Army Corps of Engineers are currently onsite assessing the damages and clearing the path for the port. The economic impact will also be minimal, according to maritime experts and supply chain analysts. None of what Lara said about this situation is true… at all…

So if Lara has legitimate evidence that this is a terror attack, her and her “intelligence sources” need to come forward with a little more evidence than just a “trust me bro”. That’s not how we do things around here. Why exactly does Lara get a pass to use unnamed sources? If we are under attack, we need to know. And if we are under attack, why is Lara Logan the only person on Earth who has sources telling her that?

I normally let this kind of stuff go, but Lara had the audacity to attack me, and claimed I was “100 percent wrong” in my assessment, and then proceeded to go on talk shows and told people to not trust me, because I was exercising discernment about prematurely declaring this was a terrorist attack. And then she blocked me when I confronted her and asked her to explain what was wrong about.

Frankly, this is absolute bullshit. Unacceptable behavior. So now it’s war.

If Lara wants to question my accurate reporting, she better show us some sauce, because as of right now, he attacks on me are based solely on conjecture, and she has moved the goalposts again and again about this incident.

Shame on you Lara for this pathetic display of “journalism”, and shame on all of you who refuse to confront her on using unnamed sources with no proof.

Qlobal-Change USA 🇺🇸🤝 🇳🇱

Forwarded from BioClandestine (BioClandestine)

So are we just going to ignore that Lara Logan claimed she had “multiple intelligence sources” tell her that the Baltimore port incident was a “9/11 style attack”?

She compared 6 civilian deaths, to 3,000 civilian deaths in the most significant terror attack in American history…

And since when did we start believing unnamed sources? When the MSM do that, we rightfully criticize them, because “unnamed sources” are used as a shield for journalists to make shit up, without consequence.

After intent being ruled out, she then claimed this was a “cyberattack” and the fallout will be an “economic nuke strike”. All authorities, local, State, Federal, Military, and private sector, have ALL confirmed their investigations do not indicate this was a terror attack, and they have reviewed the “black box” on the ship for all communications, determining that there is no evidence of intent or foul play at this time. The US Army Corps of Engineers are currently onsite assessing the damages and clearing the path for the port. The economic impact will also be minimal, according to maritime experts and supply chain analysts. None of what Lara said about this situation is true… at all…

So if Lara has legitimate evidence that this is a terror attack, her and her “intelligence sources” need to come forward with a little more evidence than just a “trust me bro”. That’s not how we do things around here. Why exactly does Lara get a pass to use unnamed sources? If we are under attack, we need to know. And if we are under attack, why is Lara Logan the only person on Earth who has sources telling her that?

I normally let this kind of stuff go, but Lara had the audacity to attack me, and claimed I was “100 percent wrong” in my assessment, and then proceeded to go on talk shows and told people to not trust me, because I was exercising discernment about prematurely declaring this was a terrorist attack. And then she blocked me when I confronted her and asked her to explain what was wrong about.

Frankly, this is absolute bullshit. Unacceptable behavior. So now it’s war.

If Lara wants to question my accurate reporting, she better show us some sauce, because as of right now, he attacks on me are based solely on conjecture, and she has moved the goalposts again and again about this incident.

Shame on you Lara for this pathetic display of “journalism”, and shame on all of you who refuse to confront her on using unnamed sources with no proof.

hottg.com/QlobalChangeUSA/37507

911 viewsMar 28 at 18:14