Create: Update:
Exploring Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques for Code Generation with Large Language Models
The results reveal the superiority and potential of PEFT over ICL (In-Context Learning) on a wide range of LLMs in reducing the computational burden and improving performance.
Main results:
- LLMs fine-tuned with PEFT techniques, i.e., a few millions of parameters, systematically outperform small language models fully fine-tuned with hundreds of millions of parameters
- Prompt tuning often outperforms LoRA even though it requires learning substantially fewer parameters
- LLMs fine-tuned using LoRA and Prompt tuning significantly outperform LLMs with ICL, even when increasing the number of prompt examples under the ICL setting
- PEFT techniques allow LLMs to better adapt to the task-specific dataset with low computational cost
The results reveal the superiority and potential of PEFT over ICL (In-Context Learning) on a wide range of LLMs in reducing the computational burden and improving performance.
Main results:
- LLMs fine-tuned with PEFT techniques, i.e., a few millions of parameters, systematically outperform small language models fully fine-tuned with hundreds of millions of parameters
- Prompt tuning often outperforms LoRA even though it requires learning substantially fewer parameters
- LLMs fine-tuned using LoRA and Prompt tuning significantly outperform LLMs with ICL, even when increasing the number of prompt examples under the ICL setting
- PEFT techniques allow LLMs to better adapt to the task-specific dataset with low computational cost
Forwarded from ml4se
Exploring Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques for Code Generation with Large Language Models
The results reveal the superiority and potential of PEFT over ICL (In-Context Learning) on a wide range of LLMs in reducing the computational burden and improving performance.
Main results:
- LLMs fine-tuned with PEFT techniques, i.e., a few millions of parameters, systematically outperform small language models fully fine-tuned with hundreds of millions of parameters
- Prompt tuning often outperforms LoRA even though it requires learning substantially fewer parameters
- LLMs fine-tuned using LoRA and Prompt tuning significantly outperform LLMs with ICL, even when increasing the number of prompt examples under the ICL setting
- PEFT techniques allow LLMs to better adapt to the task-specific dataset with low computational cost
The results reveal the superiority and potential of PEFT over ICL (In-Context Learning) on a wide range of LLMs in reducing the computational burden and improving performance.
Main results:
- LLMs fine-tuned with PEFT techniques, i.e., a few millions of parameters, systematically outperform small language models fully fine-tuned with hundreds of millions of parameters
- Prompt tuning often outperforms LoRA even though it requires learning substantially fewer parameters
- LLMs fine-tuned using LoRA and Prompt tuning significantly outperform LLMs with ICL, even when increasing the number of prompt examples under the ICL setting
- PEFT techniques allow LLMs to better adapt to the task-specific dataset with low computational cost
>>Click here to continue<<
Data Science by ODS.ai 🦜
