The previous page ⬆️
hottg.com/AbuHaatimEn/1425
The tenth matter: Is there a difference in this subject matter between the rulings of the Dunya and that of the Aakhirah, and between Disbelief -or Disbeliever- outwardly, and Disbelief -or Disbeliever- outwardly and inwardly, which of the two contains stipulation of the establishment of the evidences upon particulars?
I say seeking aid with Allah:
The clarification of this preceded in the first volume, in that the evidences made a difference between the two:
▪️As for the ruling of the Hereafter, and what relates to reward and punishment, then there is no punishment nor any torment except for those the evidences have been established upon, the most high said:
(وَمَا كُنَّا مُعَذِّبِينَ حَتَّىٰ نَبْعَثَ رَسُولًا)
"And never would We punish until We sent a messenger."
[Al-Isra':15]
So whoever had the evidences established upon them, then Shirk is ruled upon them, and they are declared disbelievers outwardly and inwardly, as the clarification of this preceded.
As for those that died whilst ignorant of Tawheed without negligence or turning away - then they take the ruling of the people of Al-Fatrah, those that will be tested by Allah.
And the Shuyuukh of Islam, Ibn Taymiyyah - Ibn-Ul-Qayyim - Muhammad bin Abdulwahaab - Ibn Baaz, similarly other Imams of the Da'wah and those that tread their way, when they negate disbelief from particulars in this area and stipulated the establishing of the evidences - they only intend with this the outward and inward disbelief, which puts the application of the punishment into effect in the worldly life, and the ruling of torment in the Hereafter.
Shaykh-Ul-Islaam, may Allah have mercy upon him, clarified that the negation of Takfeer by the people of knowledge from those that new to Islam and those that are living in far remote places, who are thought to be truly ignorant, that they only intend with this the Disbelief which one is punished for. So this is not applied to particulars except after the establishment of the evidences, and that the verses which contain the negation of the punishment before the establishment of the evidences are only applied to this type of person.
Not what became confusing upon the opposers, who opposes the way of the people of knowledge in this subject matter, and put forth these verses for the establishment of evidences upon those that worship other than Allah to label them a Mushrik!!
Also in the clarification of this Shaykh-Ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, in <Sharh Umdatul Fiqh> (2/35) says: "topic: whoever rejects its obligation due to their ignorance - are to be told, and that rejecting it out of stubbornness is disbelief". This is a continuous basis is the five pillars of Islam, and in all the agreed upon manifest rulings of those who are culpable, if the rejecter is excused for this - like those new to Islam or those that are living in far away remote places, this is due to it thought that they could be ignorant due to this - they are not declared disbelievers until they are made to know that this is the religion of Islam, because the affairs of Disbelief and punishment are not affirmed except after the reaching of the Message, especially in what isn't known by just having intellect, Allah the most high said:
(وَمَا كُنَّا مُعَذِّبِينَ حَتَّىٰ نَبْعَثَ رَسُولًا)
"And never would We punish until We sent a messenger."
[Al-Isra':15]
And the most high said:
(لِئَلَّا يَكُونَ لِلنَّاسِ عَلَى ٱللَّهِ حُجَّةٌۢ بَعْدَ ٱلرُّسُلِۚ)
"in order that mankind should have no plea against Allah after the Messengers".
[An-Nisaa':165]
And the most high said:
(وَلَوْ أَنَّآ أَهْلَكْنَٰهُم بِعَذَابٍ مِّن قَبْلِهِۦ لَقَالُوا۟ رَبَّنَا لَوْلَآ أَرْسَلْتَ إِلَيْنَا رَسُولًا)
"And if We had destroyed them with a punishment before him, they would have said, "Our Lord, why did You not send to us a messenger".
[Ta Ha:134]
And the most high said:
>>Click here to continue<<